restjoint.blogg.se

Arizona daily independent circulation
Arizona daily independent circulation




arizona daily independent circulation
  1. ARIZONA DAILY INDEPENDENT CIRCULATION ARCHIVE
  2. ARIZONA DAILY INDEPENDENT CIRCULATION REGISTRATION

The authors note that the finding of discrepancies should not be the end of the story. Lott currently serves as president of the Crime Prevention Research Center, while Smith is AFPI’s Interim Chief Operating Officer and recently served as a Special Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff of the White House Office of American Innovation and the Domestic Policy Council.

ARIZONA DAILY INDEPENDENT CIRCULATION ARCHIVE

“Yet, amazingly, these election bureaus frequently claim they do not archive their data.”

arizona daily independent circulation

“Data storage is trivially inexpensive, and saving a file time-stamped on election day would be easy,” they noted. Smith say is unacceptable in this day and age.

ARIZONA DAILY INDEPENDENT CIRCULATION REGISTRATION

8 moved to another county before the list was prepared for AFPI, Apache County would not have access to that voter’s registration file and voting history. 8 (Maricopa County did).Īs result, if someone who voted in Apache County on Nov. This was due to the fact most counties did not archived their voter records as of Nov. One problem with the analysis is that the records of who voted was not reliable, the report contends. AFPI says it took six months to finally receive all of the records needed. The data was obtained directly from each of the six counties via public records requests. Well within a statistical probability that Hamadeh actually ended up with more votes than Mayes, according to the report’s “conservative estimates.”ĪFPI decided to conduct a study after hearing of concerns that some ballots were counted more than once while other ballots were not counted at all during last November’s election. Yet even reducing the discrepancy by the number of purported protected voters, the report shows a difference of 2,200 votes. These “secured” or “protected” voters accounted for 4,078 voters who cast ballots in the 2022 General Election in the six counties, with 2,888 just in Maricopa County. It is a difference nearly 30 times the margin of 280 votes by which a Maricopa County judge ruled in late December that Abe Hamadeh lost to Kris Mayes in the attorney general race.ĪFPI’s report goes on to point out that some voters (i.e., police officers, judges, domestic violence victims) have their name and address hidden from voting reports. That resulted in an 8,241-vote discrepancy, or 0.36 percent of the total ballots counted. In precincts where the reverse was true, 2,184 more registered voters were listed as voting than ballots shown as counted. “We were strictly looking to determine whether voters and vote totals were equal.”Īccording to the report, the six counties combined had 6,057 more ballots recorded as cast than there were registered voters listed as voting. How and for whom voters voted also were not at issue,” the report notes. “We made no attempt to determine if any discrepancies were intentional or accidental. The results published June 22 show some precincts reported more absentee, mail-in, and in-person ballots being counted than there were registered voters listed as casting ballots.ĪFPI focused on data from Arizona’s four most populous counties –Maricopa, Pima, Pinal, and Yavapai– as well as Apache and Coconino which have significant tribal communities where concerns of voting irregularities had been raised in 2020. The America First Priority Institute (AFPI) recently completed a monthslong precinct-level analysis of 2022 General Election data obtained directly from six Arizona counties.






Arizona daily independent circulation